The Importance of The Government Support for Operations of Islamic Micro Finance Bank
Keywords:Microfinance banking, Socio-Political groups, Political support
The role of the government and political pressure groups are the fundamental requirement for the success of Islamic micro finance banking. It is different to the conventional banking, and it is more like a social movement. It encourages the poor people to develop themselves with the support of the government and the Islamic micro finance bank. The basic objective of such institutions to poor peasants through small amounts of advances/ agriculture raw material for crops. The returns are always difficult without support of the socio-political groups in the locality. The study is based on qualitative techniques two propositions which were theoretically selected and discussed in detail. The sample is selected of 60 persons of working in senior positions in small financial institutions. A sample of 60 officials covered for this survey. Data collect via online survey. Pre-structured close ended questionnaire was sent via email on around 150 email IDs of executives of the financial institutions. Pakistan is a collective, conservative, cultural, country where socio cultural bonds in the public are very strong. Therefore, without political support, no public work can be successful.
Bremmer, R. H. 1987. American philanthropy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. 1999. Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business and Society, 38: 167–187.
Cuili Qian (firstname.lastname@example.org) is an assistant professor of strategic management at the College of Business, City University of Hong Kong. She received her Ph.D. from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Her current research interests include corporate social responsibility and corporate political strategies in transition economies and MNCs’ staffing and control of subsidiaries.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13: 122–126
Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. 1991. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 88–105.
Getz, K. A. 1997. Research in corporate political action: Integration and assessment. Business and Society, 36: 32–72.
Godfrey, P. C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30: 777–798.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36: 5–31.
Haley, U. C. V. 1991. Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. Journal of Management Studies, 28: 485–509.
Heli Wang (email@example.com) is an associate professor in management at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Her current research focuses on employee motivation issues in the resource-based view of the firm, corporate stakeholders and social responsibility, and corporate governance. She received a Ph.D. in strategic management from The Ohio State University
Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. 1999. Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 67–81.
Jones, M. T. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.
Kramer, R. M. 1991. Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 13: 191– 228. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. 2008. Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87: 283–299.
Orlitzky, M. 2001. Does organizational size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33: 167–180
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80 (December): 5–16.
Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. 2004. Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43: 135–161.
Shaffer, B. 1995. Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and research approaches. Journal of Management, 21: 495–514.
Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. T. 2008. Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19: 143–159.
Watson, B. (Trans.). 2007. Analects of Confucius. New York: Columbia University Press.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Mubashir Qadir Khan, Mr Shariq Mubashir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.